arXiv preprint ·
InfiniteWorld: Separating Visual Evidence from Familiar Physics
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Physical reasoning requires adapting familiar expectations to the dynamics of the observed world. Existing benchmarks establish broad physical capabilities, yet an overall score leaves unclear whether answers follow visual evidence when familiar rules no longer apply. We introduce InfiniteWorld, a benchmark that pairs physical-reasoning questions with simulator videos whose physical parameters are systematically altered. Its generation pipeline connects simulation, scene screening, paired video translation, question construction, and input checks. Five tasks assess law identification, parameter estimation, temporal reasoning, analytic counterfactual comparison, and law induction. The evaluation defines five matched input settings for each question, comprising text-only evaluation and ordered or shuffled observations from simulator and translated videos. We evaluate a diverse set of video-language models under these matched settings. The results expose a persistent preference for familiar physical rules. Frames improve performance for most models, but gains differ across tasks. Strong accuracy on Earth-normal questions coexists with poor recognition of altered dynamics, and Earth-normal answers remain common when the observed physics changes. Task scores and semantic agreement further distinguish matching physical factors from matching their amount, and correct answers from repeated errors. InfiniteWorld makes these behaviors measurable through paired changes in the evidence supplied for the same question, separating visual evidence from familiar physics.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Artificial Intelligence
AgentOrch: How Close Can Global Orchestration Come to Step-by-Step Interaction?
Continual Learning Exam: Benchmarking Long-Horizon RSI and Experiential Learning in LLM Agents
How To Build A Modern Diffusion Language Model
Beyond Belief: Evaluating and Mitigating LLM Susceptibility to Misinformation
Data Optimization for LLMs: A Survey
Get the few papers worth your time in Artificial Intelligence every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.