arXiv preprint ·

A SegFormer-based model for spatial Daylight Factor prediction with comprehensive obstruction encoding and regulatory validation

Stanislava Fedorova, Alejandro Pacheco Diéguez, Christoph Berkmiller, Alberto Floris, Libny Pacheco and Marie-Claude Dubois

Published
Source
arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
Original
Read it at arXiv
Topics
Computer VisionMachine Learning

Abstract

Daylight compliance assessment in residential buildings requires time-consuming raytracing simulations and specialist model preparation, limiting its integration into iterative architectural design. We present a machine learning-based methodology for predicting the spatial distribution of the Daylight Factor (DF) directly within Building Information Modelling (BIM) environments, delivering results in seconds without model export or manual curation. The approach addresses five gaps not jointly covered by any existing model: external obstruction encoding including balconies, own building height, variable material reflectances, non-orthogonal room geometries, and regulatory validation. Two models are developed: a default-materials model with fixed reflectances for preliminary design checks, and a custom-materials model with variable project-specific reflectances. Both are trained on about 20,000 synthetic Radiance-simulated rooms and validated on a held-out synthetic dataset and 102 rooms from 18 real building models. The default-materials model achieves $δ_1$ = 83.4% and MAE = 0.11% DF on synthetic data, and on real buildings predicts BBR (Swedish) compliance area within 4.85 pp MAE (bias +2.31 pp) and TEK17 (Norwegian) mean room DF within 0.304% DF MAE (bias +0.287% DF). The custom-materials variant shows 1.7-2.4$\times$ higher error across all metrics. Both models concentrate accuracy in the BBR compliance-critical zone (DF < 1%), achieving a sub-1% DF MAE of 0.105% DF and Compliance IoU of 0.883 on real buildings. All cases where compliance is overestimated are borderline, within 10.7 pp of the BBR threshold (median 3.2 pp) and 0.36% DF of the TEK17 threshold (median 0.10% DF). The default-materials model is recommended as a replacement for preliminary daylight simulations; the custom-materials variant requires further development before use in final compliance verification.

The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.

Read it on ReadSearch

Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.

Already a reader? Sign in

All new papers in Computer Vision

Get the few papers worth your time in Computer Vision every morning.

ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.

Papers belong to their authors and publishers; every page here links to the original. All research topics