arXiv preprint ·
How Geometry Shapes Generative Model Evaluation on Riemannian Manifolds
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
On Riemannian manifolds, generative-model evaluation is geometry-dependent since curvature and dimension jointly determine distances and volume growth. Our framework systematically compares geodesic, ambient, and tangent-space versions of Wasserstein and MMD across different geometries. Using controlled-noise perturbations and Riemannian Flow Matching samples, we study metric agreement, noise sensitivity, and their relation to geometry-induced volume scaling. We find that no metric is uniformly reliable: evaluation distance can affect both measured discrepancies and noise sensitivity, varying across curvature and dimension. Our analysis leads to practical recommendations for reporting evaluation distances, comparing metric types, and calibrating metrics to the geometry of the samples.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Machine Learning
Faithful Federated Tabular Data Synthesis
A Nonconvex Framework for Joint Sparse Sample Weighting and Parameter Estimation
Online Covariance Estimation for Averaged Stochastic Gradient Descent on Riemannian Manifolds
Constrained Gradient Equilibrium: Approachability under Locally Constrained Adversaries
Causal Inference in Metric Spaces via Distance Profiles
Get the few papers worth your time in Machine Learning every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.