arXiv preprint ·
The Paired Thermal Channel Is Two Orthogonal Axes: A Controlled Attribution Study of Calibration Cost and Detection Gain in Infrared Person Detection
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
The calibrated thermal channel in infrared person detection comprises two structurally orthogonal axes. True calibrated $ΔT$ outperforms scale-matched grayscale pseudo-$ΔT$ by $+0.0221$ mAP (paired Wilcoxon $p=0.0098$, Cohen's $d=+1.08$), confirming that the calibrated channel carries information the grayscale channel lacks. The calibration axis is driven by the joint pairing-scale condition. Preserving both paired correspondence and absolute calibrated scale raises expected calibration error (ECE) from $\approx 0.05$ to $0.142$. The $2\times 2$ interaction ($p=0.0059$) localizes the rise to this condition. Breaking either factor alone returns ECE to the broken-factor level (true-vs-const $p=0.002$; true-vs-shuffled $p=0.002$). Under post-hoc temperature scaling, the pairing cost survives recalibration ($p=0.002$), while the scale cost is largely absorbed ($p=0.16$). As regards the detection axis, the gain stems from structural de-structuring. Phase randomization, which destroys spatial structure while preserving per-sample variance, yields $+0.0185$ mAP over true $ΔT$ on FLIR ADAS ($p=0.014$, $d=+0.96$). The FLAME~3 gain is $+0.0064$ mAP ($p=0.078$, n=8). On the calibration axis, the same intervention is insignificant on FLIR ADAS ($p=0.47$) but significant on FLAME~3 ($p=0.0078$). These findings rest on a five-arm controlled attribution with temperature-evidential learning (TEL) as the testbed. TEL obtains a single evidence-derived routing scalar together with a complementary diagnostic entropy, and establishes a finite-evidence degeneracy theorem proving that the acquisition product degenerates to this scalar with a closed-form bound. A physical $0.5^\circ$C threshold admits cross-dataset physical readings, whereas a gray threshold of $20$ inverts without physical interpretation.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computer Vision
4DMemory: Benchmarking Long-Horizon Spatiotemporal Memory with Harness-Augmented Agents
AdShot: Benchmarking Multimodal Large Language Models for Video Advertisement Clipping
Past as State, Present as Attention: Persistent-State Blockwise Flow Matching for Long-Horizon Co-Speech Motion Generation
AV-FABLE: Audio-Visual Manipulation Forensics in Long-Form Videos
SREdit: Scene Response Guided Appearance Editing for Projection Mapping
Get the few papers worth your time in Computer Vision every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.