arXiv preprint ·
Sustainability of TSFM Deployment and Pretraining: From Carbon Footprint Analysis to Mitigation via Pruning
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Time Series Foundation Models (TSFMs) offer strong zero-shot forecasting capabilities, but their high pretraining cost raises a practical sustainability question: does this upfront investment pay off over a full deployment lifecycle, compared to supervised standalone models that must be periodically retrained? We model the cumulative carbon cost of different approaches across a realistic industrial scenario: Chronos-2 amortizes its pretraining cost within months for large or frequently queried deployments, but a classical model remains cheaper indefinitely for small or rarely queried ones. For cases where reducing the TSFM's own cost matters, we show that removing a single encoder block (7.9% of parameters) via a gradient-free pruning criterion yields a consistent 6 to 9% reduction in FLOPs, CO2 emissions, and latency, at essentially no cost to zero-shot forecasting performance across a 25-task benchmark.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Machine Learning
GS-MoE: Training-Free MoE Compression via Groupwise Subspace Sharing and Pruning
One Call Ahead: Packed Self-Speculative Decoding with Diffusion Drafting
MAGIC: Margin-gated Contrastive Debiasing with Evidence Restoration for VLM Test-time Robustness Scaling
The Cost of an Unknown Horizon for the Last Iterate of Clipped SGD under Heavy-Tailed Noise
Rethinking Representation Geometry in Supervised Contrastive Learning under Long-Tailed Data
Get the few papers worth your time in Machine Learning every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.