arXiv preprint ·

U-NeXt: General-purpose event detection for neonatal EEG

Robert Hogan, Sean R. Mathieson, Aurel Luca, Soraia Ventura, Sean Griffin, Geraldine B. Boylan and John M. O'Toole

Published
Source
arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
Original
Read it at arXiv
Topics
Machine LearningSignal ProcessingMedical Physics

Abstract

We developed U-NeXt, a general framework for neonatal electroencephalography (EEG) event detection based on semantic segmentation. Its convolutional encoder-decoder directly segments individual channels using long input segments to preserve temporal context. A shared architecture and training framework were developed using low-voltage interval, artefact, and seizure datasets containing 51, 98, and 278 neonates, respectively, comprising over 11,000 hours of EEG and 82,000 annotated events. Performance was compared with task-specific ConvNeXt classifiers. For seizure detection, we also evaluated U-NeXt+, trained on an expanded dataset. Both U-NeXt variants and the ConvNeXt baseline were evaluated on two independent held-out seizure datasets, Helsinki and Cork, comprising 130 neonates, with recordings annotated by three experts. U-NeXt improved detection across all three event types, with particular gains in sensitivity for short events. U-NeXt+ achieved Matthews correlation coefficients of 0.862 and 0.891 on Helsinki and Cork, respectively, and improved hourly seizure burden correlations by 30-40% relative to ConvNeXt. U-NeXt+ met the criterion for expert-level performance on both datasets (p < 0.001). In separate computational benchmarks, U-NeXt reduced batch inference time relative to ConvNeXt by 254-fold on a central processing unit and 200-fold on a graphics processing unit. A common segmentation framework improves detection across diverse neonatal EEG event types while substantially reducing inference time. Accurate seizure burden estimates and performance comparable to expert reviewers support its potential use in continuous monitoring and clinical decision support.

The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.

Read it on ReadSearch

Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.

Already a reader? Sign in

All new papers in Machine Learning

Get the few papers worth your time in Machine Learning every morning.

ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.

Papers belong to their authors and publishers; every page here links to the original. All research topics