arXiv preprint ·

Computational De Novo Design of Miniprotein Candidate Neutralizers Targeting the IL-23 Cytokine Subunit p19

Raghav Paladugu and Fardina Fathmiul Alam

Published
Source
arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
Original
Read it at arXiv
Topics
BiomoleculesMachine Learning

Abstract

Interleukin-23 (IL-23) drives T-helper-17 inflammation underlying inflammatory bowel disease and psoriasis; anti-p19 antibodies are clinically effective but large, costly, and injectable. De novo miniproteins are an attractive alternative, yet published designs target the IL-23 receptor; the IL-23 cytokine itself has not been addressed. A further obstacle is that the standard confidence score (ipTM) tracks construct length rather than interface quality. We computationally design miniprotein binders against the IL-23R-binding face of p19 (PDB 3DUH) and score every design with ipSAE, a length-robust interface metric derived from AlphaFold-initial-guess predicted aligned error. A conventional RFdiffusion/ProteinMPNN/ColabFold pipeline yields no reliable predicted interface across 972 designs (best ipSAE 0.30), and a scoring artifact, in which single-sequence ColabFold under-rates binder pLDDT by approximately 56 points, explains an earlier misleading "binders do not fold" signal. An interface-optimized hallucination method (BindCraft), scored identically, yields 42 of 50 designs above ipSAE 0.60 (best 0.804). An AlphaFold-independent geometric check reproduces the conventional failure: no top-ranked conventional design reaches the buried area or interface hydrogen-bond count of the weakest lead. Five all-alpha-helical leads (72-104 residues) collectively engage all six targeted hotspots; two dock within the intact p40/p19 heterodimer and all show favorable Rosetta energetics. A p40-alone counter-screen returns ipSAE 0.00 for all five, indicating no spurious p40 interface. To our knowledge, these are the first computationally proposed de novo miniprotein candidates designed to occlude the IL-23R-binding face of IL-23 p19. All results require experimental validation.

The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.

Read it on ReadSearch

Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.

Already a reader? Sign in

All new papers in Biomolecules

Get the few papers worth your time in Biomolecules every morning.

ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.

Papers belong to their authors and publishers; every page here links to the original. All research topics