arXiv preprint ·
CC4Q Workbench: From Quantum Repositories to Analyzable Code Comments
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Quantum software development kits (SDKs) expose high-level APIs whose use requires an understanding of underlying mathematical principles, circuit semantics, and hardware properties. Code comments can provide natural-language or structural explanations that are not explicit in API calls. However, studying comments in a new quantum SDK still requires researchers to coordinate separate steps for comment extraction, quantum-specific classification, and manual verification, resulting in repeated integration effort. To address this problem, we present CC4Q Workbench, an open-source workbench that integrates these steps into a reusable workflow. Given a Python repository at a specified revision, CC4Q Workbench automatically extracts code-comment pairs, segments comments into sentence-level units, and applies two trained classifiers to identify quantum-specific content and assign quantum-knowledge categories. Its web interface supports exploration of bundled datasets, inspection of code snippets, corpus construction from new repositories, manual annotation with model predictions hidden during binary labeling, and classifier fine-tuning using exported annotations. The release provides aggregate statistics for six SDK datasets comprising 39,593 sentence-level code comment units (SCCUs), of which 17,517 are browsable in the web interface. Applied to three additional application-layer Qiskit repositories outside the original CC4Q dataset, the pipeline ran without code changes and produced 11,517 SCCUs. Manual verification of 379 SCCUs showed 85.0% agreement between human annotations and the binary classifier's predictions.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Software Engineering
Are LLM-Generated Formal Specifications Faithful to Their Requirements? A Study on Bimodal Formal Specification Generation
PMU Foundation Model Bridge: A Tool for Connecting Synchrophasor Streams to Time Series Foundation Models
CrowdStrike Channel File 291: An Engineering Analysis of a Global Endpoint Outage
OneCodeReviewBench: Typed Decisions for Code Review and Search
Who Verifies the Tools? How Warped Formatters Mislead Agents and Their Verifiers
Get the few papers worth your time in Software Engineering every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.