arXiv preprint ·
When Does Dynamics Randomization Test Context Inference?
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Environments with randomized dynamics are widely used to ask whether world models need explicit context inference. However, randomization can leave little predictive information for a context encoder to add, because distinct latent parameters may produce similar transitions at visited states, or those states may already reveal the active context. We formalize the remaining one-step information as predictive headroom and compare kernels under fixed and visited state--action distributions to distinguish changes in query coverage from changes in context weights. We analyze discrete and continuous environments and find low headroom both when kernels differ little and when visitation reduces an otherwise large discrepancy. At the same time, resetting state components increases headroom, showing that context evidence accumulates in state. We propose reporting this headroom alongside the randomized parameters, so that gains from explicit context inference can be interpreted relative to the information missing from the current state and action.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Machine Learning
GS-MoE: Training-Free MoE Compression via Groupwise Subspace Sharing and Pruning
One Call Ahead: Packed Self-Speculative Decoding with Diffusion Drafting
MAGIC: Margin-gated Contrastive Debiasing with Evidence Restoration for VLM Test-time Robustness Scaling
The Cost of an Unknown Horizon for the Last Iterate of Clipped SGD under Heavy-Tailed Noise
Rethinking Representation Geometry in Supervised Contrastive Learning under Long-Tailed Data
Get the few papers worth your time in Machine Learning every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.