arXiv preprint ·
An Error Budget for Shuffled Multimodal Windows in the 3rd WEAR Challenge: Stacking, Count Constraints and Seam Matching
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
The 3rd WEAR Dataset Challenge asks for an activity label for every one-second window of four unseen participants. Each window has 15 VideoMAEv2 frame embeddings, the accelerometer signal of one random limb, and the windows are shuffled. This report is an empirical analysis of one system built after the challenge deadline. Window classifiers are stacked with features averaged over per-participant graphs of video neighbours and scored successor candidates, and a mean-field style decoder with a soft count constraint per activity labels all windows of a participant together. The setting is offline and transductive, and the count constraint relies on each activity being performed once. In a participant-wise simulation with participant-level bootstrap intervals, stacking added 0.051 macro F1 over stage-1 fusion and the count constraint 0.011 (95% interval 0.006 to 0.017). A quadratic seam distance ranks the true same-limb successor first among about 720 candidates in 83.9% of cases, but adding it to the link model changed macro F1 by -0.0001 (-0.0006 to 0.0005). With the decoder settings and the mixing weight chosen inside the folds and the mislabelled spans left out of training, the system scores 0.936 in simulation (0.940 for participants who performed each activity once); the submitted configuration scores 0.938 (0.943). Per-participant scores range from 0.80 to 0.97. These results come from a non-nested stacking protocol that uses unlabelled features transductively, so they are not a fully inductive estimate. An oracle that averages the final unary scores over the true segments reaches 0.973, and 79% of the remaining errors involve the null class. On the private leaderboard, which no choice used, the selected Kaggle submission scored 0.9231 (public 0.9254, with bounds partly tuned there), and a later one with bounds chosen in simulation scored 0.9247 (public 0.9253).
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computer Vision
MAGIC: Margin-gated Contrastive Debiasing with Evidence Restoration for VLM Test-time Robustness Scaling
AdShot: Benchmarking Multimodal Large Language Models for Video Advertisement Clipping
Rethinking Representation Geometry in Supervised Contrastive Learning under Long-Tailed Data
Fast Instinct, Slow Reason: A Dual-Speed Agentic Framework for Self-Configuring Multi-Object Tracking in Satellite Video
NUViT: Vision Transformers for Fourier Space Data
Get the few papers worth your time in Computer Vision every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.