arXiv preprint ·
MS-TTRL: Breaking the Frequency Conflict in Multiple-Solution Test-Time Reinforcement Learning
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Scientific, engineering, and mathematical reasoning tasks can admit multiple valid solutions, while exhaustive annotation of the full solution set is often prohibitively costly. Test-time reinforcement learning (TTRL) applies reinforcement learning to unlabeled test instances, offering a label-free approach to multiple-solution reasoning. In this setting, generation frequency serves two opposing objectives: correctness estimation favors frequent outcomes, whereas outcome-level diversity preservation favors less frequent outcomes. We term this tension the \textbf{Frequency Conflict}. To resolve this conflict, we propose MS-TTRL, which obtains frequency-independent correctness estimates through Outcome-Level Self-Verification while reserving generation frequency solely for diversity preservation. Three-State Outcome Cache and the Candidate State support verification reuse across repeated observations and confidence-aware handling of ambiguous outcomes, while Confidence-Gated Inverse Probability Scaling selectively strengthens the learning signals of rare, reliably verified outcomes. Experiments across two benchmarks, four multiple-solution tasks, and three backbone models, each evaluated with five random seeds, show that MS-TTRL improves Recovery Rate by 19.13 percentage points on average over the best-performing label-free baseline and approaches the performance of the supervised IPS-GRPO.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Machine Learning
GS-MoE: Training-Free MoE Compression via Groupwise Subspace Sharing and Pruning
One Call Ahead: Packed Self-Speculative Decoding with Diffusion Drafting
MAGIC: Margin-gated Contrastive Debiasing with Evidence Restoration for VLM Test-time Robustness Scaling
The Cost of an Unknown Horizon for the Last Iterate of Clipped SGD under Heavy-Tailed Noise
Rethinking Representation Geometry in Supervised Contrastive Learning under Long-Tailed Data
Get the few papers worth your time in Machine Learning every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.