arXiv preprint ·
Collection-Date Assignment Redirects Answers in Temporal QA
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
A collection date records when a source revision was acquired, not when its contents changed. Can assigning this metadata redirect temporal question answering despite unchanged evidence? Swapping the question day and following day between two revisions lowers later-reference exact match (EM) by 37.6-51.4 percentage points across five open-weight LLMs on 595 Wikipedia pages, replicated on 128 disjoint pages. Previous-day swaps retain 29.0-39.6-point losses on 497 pages. Seven prompt variants, including explicit ignore-collection instructions and archived-revision provenance, retain the effect. Fictional answers and English month-name question dates show that remembered answers and identical date strings are unnecessary. Matched thinking reduces Qwen3.5's penalty from 30.1 to 11.1 points, while native reasoners vary. Two API LLMs show small Wikipedia swap effects and rarely shift to earlier answers on fictional records. Large swap-induced losses concentrate around the question date; swaps between distant dates have much smaller effects. Adding fields containing one observed acquisition date lowers EM relative to omission in three of five LLMs after correction. The diagnostic isolates metadata effects from changing evidence or missing the relevant revision, and provides a practical audit for temporal QA inputs.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computation & Language / NLP
CRM-Agent-Bench: Benchmarking Tool-Using Agents in Stateful Enterprise Environments
Examining form-based linguistic productivity in people and large language models
X-Dubbing: Speech-to-Speech Translation under Temporal and Visual Constraints
Perturbation-Based Data Selection for Medical Question Answering
How Much Do You Trust A Dog? Quantifying Hint-Following in Reasoning Language Models
Get the few papers worth your time in Computation & Language / NLP every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.