arXiv preprint ·
Forecasting Associations, Not Interventions: A Preregistered Causal Audit of Covariate-Aware Time Series Foundation Models
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Covariate-aware time series foundation models (TSFMs) accept a future path for a control variable and return a forecast, inviting what-if queries. The query is interventional; the models are trained on observational data. We determine whether their answers are the conditional slope $\partial E[Y|X]$ or the interventional effect $\partial E[Y|do(X)]$, at three levels. Theory: a Bayes-optimal observational predictor answers interventional queries associationally unless the adjustment set is available and used; for in-context least squares we derive the resulting confounding gap -- a model's effect estimate under an observational minus under a randomized context -- in closed form, a parameter-free reference line. Behaviour: on a preregistered grid with exact counterfactual ground truth, Chronos-2, TiRex-2, TabPFN-TS and TimesFM-2.5 all track this line ($R^2$ 0.90-1.00) and respond more confounded than regression itself (slopes 1.3-1.8), on linear and nonlinear structural models. Pairs of models with identical observational laws prove this is not an identifiability limit: when the effect is identifiable, least squares recovers 100% of the true effect difference, Chronos-2 75%, TiRex-2 34%. Representation: linear probes decode the data-generating regime (94-96%) and the true effect ($R^2$ 0.7-0.9) from embeddings that the forecasts ignore. On two physical systems with randomized actuators, pretrained models under-respond by 2-5x and ignore in-window confounding. Minutes of interventional post-training on 3,000 synthetic series cut the gap by up to 83% and transfer outside the training prior. Its forecasting cost is a replay-distribution effect: replaying the model's own pretraining prior cuts it from +47% to +10% MASE, and with low-rank adaptation yields a recipe meeting the preregistered criterion over three seeds (52-61% gap reduction at +1-3% cost) while improving the DoTime benchmark.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Machine Learning
Lifetime-valid decisions by continually evolving AI analysts
GS-MoE: Training-Free MoE Compression via Groupwise Subspace Sharing and Pruning
When News Gets Old: Portfolio Allocation with Reinforcement Learning and Large Language Models
MAGIC: Margin-gated Contrastive Debiasing with Evidence Restoration for VLM Test-time Robustness Scaling
Bridging the Closed-World Gap: Interpretable Anomaly Detection via a Hybrid TSK-FCM Ensemble on the BETH Dataset
Get the few papers worth your time in Machine Learning every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.