arXiv preprint ·
Measuring the Verifier's Floor: How Much Apparent Rare-Word Text-to-Speech Error Is ASR Error?
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Text-to-speech (TTS) is usually evaluated by transcribing its output with an automatic speech recognition (ASR) system, so the word error rate also counts recognizer errors. We measure these errors on human recordings of the test sentences. On LibriSpeech and FLEURS, the evaluation recognizer misses 33-67% of very rare words even in human speech, and all three recognizers miss 22-42%. Checking every word with two more recognizer families lowers the apparent TTS error on words that at least one recognizer hears two- to three-fold (very rare LibriSpeech words: from 10-13% to 3-5%), yet very rare words remain the hardest. Ignoring words the recognizer misses in human speech is biased: the other recognizers find TTS errors far more often on these words (4-6% vs. 0.2-0.3%) and overturn about half of the errors this mask keeps. As half of the remaining adjudicated errors may be spelling variants, a listening test is needed.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Sound
MixJudge: Learning a Language-Queryable Critic for Vocal Mixing
MI-MIDI 2: From Observation to Control with Sparse Autoencoders in Text-to-MIDI Generation
CAVC: Convergence-Adaptive Audio-Visual Cache for Modality-Asymmetric Diffusion Generation
DIAL-S2ST: Learning Latency Control for Simultaneous Speech-to-Speech Translation
Synthetic-to-Real Code-Switched ASR: A Spontaneous Nepali-English Podcast Benchmark
Get the few papers worth your time in Sound every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.