arXiv preprint ·
Superintelligent Software Engineering: Governance That Scales with Capability
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Software agents are being trained to exceed human engineers; we argue that capability alone does not produce better software engineering. We define superintelligent software engineering as the discipline of building and evolving software with agents whose capability exceeds that of human engineers, in which governance (gates, contracts, decisions and decay control) scales with capability. The argument rests on three claims. First, correctness in a project rests on decisions and contracts that the code does not carry. Second, knowledge decays. Third, once an agent outpaces its reviewers, reading catches a shrinking share of the changes built on stale knowledge. A simple model shows that, past a fixed review capacity, escaping changes grow linearly with throughput while the share that reading catches falls toward zero; governance can lower the slope, capability alone cannot. An exploratory snapshot of 452 of the most-starred public GitHub repositories finds a root-level or .github agent context file in 48.67% (95% confidence interval 44.1 to 53.3); in the median file that names repository paths, 9.5% to 22% of those paths do not resolve, depending on how a reference is read. We then present OSTEON, a discipline for the regime, released with a DOI (10.5281/zenodo.23436020): each project gets a governed knowledge repository of decisions and contracts, every change is checked mechanically against it, and the knowledge itself is checked for decay at every session start; planning is gated, and sessions record what they learn without writing rules. We report no measured effect of OSTEON, mark claims about its mechanisms as opinion and the author's practice heuristics as design rationale, and state the questions that would falsify the thesis.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Software Engineering
Stale Instruction Files Override the Code in Coding Agents: A One-Sentence Fix
Are LLM-Generated Formal Specifications Faithful to Their Requirements? A Study on Bimodal Formal Specification Generation
Governance-State Corruption in Long-Term Memory for LLM Agents: A Cross-Model Stress Test
CrowdStrike Channel File 291: An Engineering Analysis of a Global Endpoint Outage
From Tokens to Credits to Outcomes: Pricing AI Across Models, Applications, and Cloud Platforms
Get the few papers worth your time in Software Engineering every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.