arXiv preprint ·
Truthful by Omission: Click Thinning for LLM-Native Advertising
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Generative AI assistants are becoming an advertising medium, embedding sponsored content in their answers. This setting departs from classical position auctions in two ways: an ad's click-through rate depends on the passage that hosts it, and because users stop at their first click, earlier ads take clicks from later ones. This competition for clicks makes truthfulness delicate: a higher bid can reshape the allocation and put a competitor ahead of the bidder, reducing the bidder's clicks. Existing mechanisms either attain a constant fraction of the optimal welfare (advertisers' total click value) but are not known to be truthful, or are truthful but their welfare guarantee degrades as the number of passages grows. We achieve both even when the answer and its editorial order are fixed before bidding. Assuming each ad's click-through rate when reached is known and unaffected by omitting other ads, we give a computationally efficient mechanism that is truthful in expectation and attains at least half the optimal welfare under free reordering. Our key idea, click thinning, omits ads at random, showing earlier ads less often so that each ad's overall click probability no longer depends on the order of the ads. Welfare maximization then reduces to a tractable matching problem, and solving it exactly with VCG-style payments makes truthful bidding optimal in expectation. Characterizing the click probabilities that omission can achieve sharpens the approximation factor from $2$ to $2-(1-δ)^{K-1}$ when at most $K$ ads are shown and each click-through rate is at most $δ$. This factor is the best possible for any order-preserving rule, even one that ignores incentives and computation, so truthfulness and computational efficiency incur no additional worst-case loss.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computer Science & Game Theory
Fast Iterative Combinatorial Auctions via Deep Reinforcement Learning
Pareto-optimal Scheduling with Predictions
Equilibria and Learning in Competitive Market Making
TempShap: When and How Much a Feature Matters in Time-Series Forecasting
Jointly Modeling Preferences and Imperfect Decision-Making in Large Language Models
Get the few papers worth your time in Computer Science & Game Theory every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.