arXiv preprint ·
Joint or Per-Option? Compact Encoders for Closed-Set Decisions from 17 Million to 1 Billion Parameters
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Many language-model pipelines end in a closed-set decision, such as selecting a tool. Prompting a large language model for it is slow and order-sensitive. We ask how small an encoder for such decisions can be and whether it should read the options jointly or separately. In a three-seed study at 32 million parameters, per-option scoring beats joint scoring on a held-out sample of a 37-benchmark decision suite by 5.8 points of chance-corrected skill at matched optimizer steps and by 2.8 at approximately matched training compute; two external benchmarks agree, though not significantly on their unseen tasks. Crossing reader with initialisation shows that the advantage requires a reranker initialisation, whose query-candidate pair input matches per-option reading; from the raw encoder the two readers are indistinguishable. Per-option scoring needs 5 to 13 times more encoder passes: at most twice the median latency, but more than four times the mean. Of six released joint encoders (17 million to 1 billion parameters), the 68- and 150-million-parameter models exceed a 435-million-parameter DeBERTa-v3 zero-shot classifier by 4.9 and 5.9 accuracy points on 209 overlap-audited System1-Arena tasks and are at least on par with it on the 145 tasks unseen in training. The smallest answers a median request in 14 milliseconds on 16 processor threads, against 728 for the classifier. Reordering options changes 12 to 23% of the joint models' answers (per-option scoring: none). Up to 68 million parameters, they lead their size range on a public leaderboard's private, mainly in-distribution tests.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computation & Language / NLP
Governed Self-Evolution for Autonomous Investing: A Multi-Agent LLM System with an Invariant Core
CRM-Agent-Bench: Benchmarking Tool-Using Agents in Stateful Enterprise Environments
TT-SAX: A Two-Track Time Series Symbolization for Natural Language Shape Querying
X-Dubbing: Speech-to-Speech Translation under Temporal and Visual Constraints
The Fusion Tax: A Diagnostic Analysis of When Hybrid Retrieval Hurts
Get the few papers worth your time in Computation & Language / NLP every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.