arXiv preprint ·
PAIR: Preference-Aligned Intent Retrieval for Premium People Recommendation at LinkedIn
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
General-purpose embeddings trained on profile similarity often misrank candidates in professional networks, where relevance is inherently complementary rather than symmetric. For example, job seekers usually engage with recruiters rather than peers with similar credentials. Current user recommendation systems are often built on profile similarity or social signals such as shared connections, which are effective in friend-oriented social networks where users tend to connect with similar people or within existing social circles. However, this does not hold in professional platforms like LinkedIn, where interactions are often goal-driven and cross-role interactions, requiring matching based on complementary intents rather than similarity or social proximity. In this paper, we propose Preference-Aligned Intent Retrieval, a retrieval framework that is designed to model user intent preference instead of profile similarity. Our approach is inspired by the preference-learning perspective of Direct Preference Optimization, but instantiates preference learning as an exposure-conditioned multi-negative contrastive objective over embeddings. This formulation simplifies training and scales efficiently to large candidate sets without requiring an explicit reference model. Furthermore, we incorporate user interaction history by aggregating click histories with positional encoding to capture temporal order, which enables constant-cost updates of user representations over a fixed history window, allowing new interactions to be incorporated without re-encoding history. As a result, personalization can be updated efficiently using lightweight CPU operations without repeated LLM inference during serving. We evaluate PAIR on LinkedIn's Premium retrieval task. A 0.6B parameter model achieves a MAR@100 of 0.45.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Information Retrieval
Better Reasoning, Not Just Bigger Models: A Structure-Grounded Framework for Efficient and Reliable Inference
Scaling Graph Query Processing: Focused Exploration on Partitions Using Load Balancing
The Fusion Tax: A Diagnostic Analysis of When Hybrid Retrieval Hurts
From Item Scores to Semantic Tokens: Test-Time Collaborative Adaptation for Generative Recommendation
Compiling Autoregressive LLM Control into Policy-Exact Parallel Inference for Hierarchical RAG
Get the few papers worth your time in Information Retrieval every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.