arXiv preprint ·
What Ethereum Developers Ask For, and Whether They Get It: Ten Years of Ethereum Stack Exchange
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- DOI
- 10.5281/zenodo.23551228
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
The Ethereum community learns where developers struggle through surveys and interviews, which record what developers say when asked about a chosen theme. Ethereum Stack Exchange (ESE) records what they ask for unprompted, and whether anyone resolves it. We study every question posted to ESE from Jan 2016 to Dec 2025, 54,637 in all, and label each with a prompt-based topic pipeline seeded with eight Ethereum-specific topics and open to new ones (22 topics in all). A three-provider committee of language models screens the labels, and manual adjudication of every disputed case puts their accuracy at 87.9 to 93.5%. Because the corpus is the complete record, no rate carries sampling error. We ask what developers ask for help with, whether the venue still resolves it, and, where it does not, whether the questions changed or their resolution did. Demand is concentrated on writing, deploying, and debugging contracts; the toolchain is the second-largest topic and growing, while security, consensus, and scaling are thin. Supply has weakened, and unevenly: answers still arrive, closure falls further. Across five estimators of the decade, the share of questions drawing any answer fell by 9.5 to 18.6 percentage points, but among answered questions the share reaching an accepted answer fell by 16.2 to 24.5. Rebuilding the later acceptance rate at the earlier topic mix moves the fall only from 9.40 to 9.32 points, so the topic mix does not explain it. Who asks separates outcomes far more sharply than what is asked: acceptance runs from 19.8% for askers below 10 reputation to 66.8% at 10k and above, a 47- point spread with a gradient in every year, against 17 across topics, and a shift toward newer askers accounts for up to 59% of the acceptance fall. The largest of seven properties an asker controls accompanies 5 points. The record places the support gap in the toolchain and among newcomers.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Software Engineering
Stale Instruction Files Override the Code in Coding Agents: A One-Sentence Fix
Are LLM-Generated Formal Specifications Faithful to Their Requirements? A Study on Bimodal Formal Specification Generation
Governance-State Corruption in Long-Term Memory for LLM Agents: A Cross-Model Stress Test
CrowdStrike Channel File 291: An Engineering Analysis of a Global Endpoint Outage
From Tokens to Credits to Outcomes: Pricing AI Across Models, Applications, and Cloud Platforms
Get the few papers worth your time in Software Engineering every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.