arXiv preprint ·
Evaluation of Front-End Feature Matching for Lunar Visual SLAM
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Lunar rovers will primarily rely on cameras for localization until navigation satellite services are deployed, and will continue to need them afterwards for relative navigation, hazard detection, and surface operations. Visual odometry (VO) and Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (SLAM) mostly estimate motion by matching features between frames. However, feature matchers are developed on urban, indoor and driving scenes, planetary studies compare them on orbital registration or within complete SLAM systems, and real lunar imagery with reference poses is scarce, so matching between rover frames on low-texture, harshly lit terrain, and its effect on VO, has not been compared. We benchmark eleven classical and learned detector-matcher combinations on nine synthetic, lunar-testbed, and terrestrial-analogue datasets, and a feature tracker, scoring pairwise pose accuracy against baseline and the trajectory error of the resulting VO. Under a common rotation-only metric, the SuperPoint pairings outperform SIFT with ratio-tested FLANN matching on both lunar testbeds and one analogue site, with smaller or unresolved differences on synthetic data. When rotation and translation direction are scored jointly, this SIFT pairing exceeds both SuperPoint pairings on four synthetic datasets, so synthetic results alone do not establish relative performance on real rover imagery. In stereo VO, the SuperPoint pairings are not consistently more accurate than SIFT, but only they keep tracking on all eight sequential datasets. Pairings with classical detectors depend on lighting while SuperPoint changes little: a low spotlight makes them more accurate than diffuse light on the same testbed views, consistent with more contrast and detected keypoints. SuperPoint with LightGlue is the fastest learned combination (16 ms per frame), and DINOv2 retrieval proposals still need geometric verification.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computer Vision
Visual Grounding First, Multimodal In-context Learning Follows
MAGIC: Margin-gated Contrastive Debiasing with Evidence Restoration for VLM Test-time Robustness Scaling
KinoUAV: A Benchmark for Safe and Stable UAV Vision-Language Navigation with Kinodynamic Modeling
Rethinking Representation Geometry in Supervised Contrastive Learning under Long-Tailed Data
GSHeadRelight: Fast Relightability for 3D Gaussian Head Synthesis
Get the few papers worth your time in Computer Vision every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.