arXiv preprint ·
PLE: Physical-Engineering's Last Exam
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Frontier language models now score above 90% on popular knowledge benchmarks and are increasingly deployed as agents that carry out multi-hour professional work. Yet no existing benchmark tests whether they can perform the real-world, economically valuable work of a professional physical engineer, such as modelling physics and legal code requirements across a multi-format project corpus, optimising material and installation costs, and issuing 2D/3D engineering design packages that a licensed reviewer would sign off on. Existing engineering benchmarks focus on textbook question answering, isolated tool calls or self-contained toy design problems. As a result, most of these benchmarks are already saturated by leading agents and solving them is far away from delivering real engineering design. We introduce PLE, a benchmark of 85 long-horizon, agentic tasks in professional physical engineering consisting of electrical, civil, structural and mechanical engineering, where solving a task means completing a realistic, billable engineering deliverable. PLE combines two complementary curation paths. Expert-Authored tasks are created end to end by practising engineers from a professional data provider's expert pool. Co-Authored tasks start from problem statements written by practising engineers; an adversarial Creator-Solver agent pipeline constructs each task's realistic project environment, executable grader and reference deliverables before sending them to expert engineers for validation and difficulty intensification. We evaluate a variety of frontier LLMs under seven publicly available agent harnesses. Even the strongest configuration reaches a mean score of only 50.6%, while spending 27M tokens and 63 minutes per task on average, demonstrating the substantial gap between current agents and autonomous physical engineering design.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Artificial Intelligence
VeriEvolve: Evaluator-First Evolution for Tool-Using Agents
Governed Self-Evolution for Autonomous Investing: A Multi-Agent LLM System with an Invariant Core
Enhancing Cross-Grade Generalization in Banana Variety Classification via Hybrid CNN-Transformers and Knowledge Self-Distillation
Lifetime-valid decisions by continually evolving AI analysts
An Evidence-Driven Multi-Agent Compound AI System for Head and Neck Proton Radiotherapy Planning
Get the few papers worth your time in Artificial Intelligence every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.