arXiv preprint ·
Agentic Architecture of Information Systems. The AAM/5C Model: A Reference Model for Distributed Autonomy
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Large organizations increasingly face what this book calls the cognitive complexity wall: at the scale of hundreds of interacting components, maintaining the dependency map and reacting at the pace of incidents exceeds what a human team can deliver. This conceptual volume proposes AAM/5C, in which five capabilities (Capture, Comprehend, Choose, Coordinate, Control) are instantiated across seven logical layers, L1 to L7. A single authorization rule, R-AUT, separates who proposes, who decides and who executes: a probabilistic planner (L4) proposes; a governance layer (L6) decides under signed policies and records its verdict in a signed evaluation proof; a security layer (L5) issues a short-lived act token bound to that proof; a policy enforcement point verifies both before the target layer materializes the act. Under an explicit guarantee contract, two analytical statements (H7a, H8a) hold by construction. The other statements of its ten hypotheses (H1 to H10), including log completeness (H7b) and non-bypass of the enforcement point (H8b), are refutable, and the protocol that could refute them is fixed before any measurement. The contribution of the book is a prescriptive reference model that articulates, under this single authorization rule, known mechanisms and adds three constructs, all to be validated: the Validation step of the Distributed Autonomy Loop, the ephemeral authority surface and the cognitive dependency plane. The book positions them against autonomic computing, multi-agent systems, enterprise architecture and agent protocols (MCP, A2A), gives an authorization policy in Rego and a partial TLA+ specification of peer consensus, and sets out a validation program with quantified milestones. It reports no empirical results. This English edition is a translation of the French original, produced with the assistance of AI tools and validated by the author.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Software Engineering
Resonance and Depth: Composing Timbral Identity and Spatial Form in an Artist-in-the-Loop Co-Creative Multi-Agent Percussive Performance
Governed Self-Evolution for Autonomous Investing: A Multi-Agent LLM System with an Invariant Core
MA-UITD: Offline Multi-Agent Reward Inference for Characterizing Continuous Social Behavior
LLM Multi-Agent Systems Are Vulnerable to Herding and Runaway Cascades
Design and Tuning of Multi-Agent Systems Using Bayesian Evolutionary Optimization
Get the few papers worth your time in Software Engineering every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.