arXiv preprint ·
Accelerating Wildfire Hazard Mapping Across Canada with an AI Surrogate Modelling Framework
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Canada's increasing wildfire activity requires frequent national hazard mapping to guide proactive mitigation, including fuel management, land-use planning, infrastructure protection, and evacuation routing. However, process-based wildfire simulation frameworks (e.g., BurnP3 and BurnP3+) rely on computationally intensive Monte Carlo simulations to model burn probability, fire intensity, and rate of spread. These workflows can take days to weeks to process a single regional modelling unit. To overcome these computational bottlenecks, we present three contributions developed through collaboration between AI researchers and wildfire modelling experts: (a) a standardized framework for training, fine-tuning, and evaluating AI surrogate models against process-based wildfire simulators; (b) a multi-task deep learning surrogate trained on national-scale data to emulate burn probability, mean fire intensity, and mean rate of spread at a fraction of the computational cost (seconds); and (c) domain-specific metrics and counterfactual evaluation protocols to probe out-of-distribution generalization. Integrating geospatial data (fuel, terrain, ignition likelihood) and regional weather, our model approximates BurnP3+ simulation outputs, achieving strong performance across agreement, rank-correlation, error, and spatial-overlap metrics. It preserves downstream hazard classifications and produces physically plausible responses to expert-informed counterfactual interventions. On a representative region, the surrogate achieves 806-fold end-to-end CPU acceleration and uses 13% of BurnP3+'s host memory, facilitating rapid scenario analysis.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Artificial Intelligence
Between Spoilers and Guesswork: Avoiding Over-Specification in Coding Benchmarks
Screening LLM Judges Without Ground Truth: A Preliminary Evaluation of an AI Dental Hygiene Coach
StoBasket: Joint Upsell and Cross-Sell Optimization for Contribution Margin
What Matters for NVFP4 Training? A Comparative Study of Low-Precision Pretraining Recipes
When Can You Trust an Agent's Own Verifier? Stress-Testing Counterfactual Rationale Verification Under Search Pressure and Oracle Access
Get the few papers worth your time in Artificial Intelligence every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.