arXiv preprint ·
DynaCI: Generating GitHub Actions Workflows via Dynamic Analysis
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Continuous Integration (CI) is an essential practice that automatically validates code changes through builds and tests. However, configuring CI workflows remains challenging, as modern software often features complex architectures, numerous dependencies, and support for diverse execution environments. Most CI platforms also require workflows to be written in their particular domain-specific languages. As a result, CI workflows are often error-prone and hard to maintain, especially for those unfamiliar with CI semantics. Prior work on automated CI workflow generation require developers to create specifications that describe their intended workflows using natural language, partial workflows, etc. However, in practice, developers may struggle to articulate requirements and may be unaware of available CI features. To address these limitations, we propose DynaCI, a novel approach that uses runtime information from developers' local environments to generate CI workflows. DynaCI (i) traces the developers' local environment to collect runtime information, (ii) constructs an initial workflow by applying runtime-informed heuristics, and (iii) iteratively refines the workflow via LLM-based Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG). We evaluate DynaCI on 50 popular Python projects that use GitHub Actions, a popular CI platform, and compare it against the state-of-the-art CI workflow generation approaches: GH-WCOM and LLM4GW. DynaCI outperforms these existing approaches by more than 21.13% in BLEU score and 20.96% in F1 score on average. It also generates workflows without missing functionality in 56% of cases, while requiring fewer manual modifications to repair such exceptions. These results demonstrate that leveraging runtime information substantially improves LLM-based CI workflow generation, and offer a promising direction for broader DevOps configuration automation.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Software Engineering
VeriEvolve: Evaluator-First Evolution for Tool-Using Agents
Stale Instruction Files Override the Code in Coding Agents: A One-Sentence Fix
Symmetry-Oriented Testing Framework for Variational Quantum Algorithms
Governance-State Corruption in Long-Term Memory for LLM Agents: A Cross-Model Stress Test
VeeReview: Measuring Build-Verify Pairs in Agent-Authored Pull Requests from a V-Model Perspective
Get the few papers worth your time in Software Engineering every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.