arXiv preprint ·
Real PMIDs, Wrong Papers: Harness Design for Biomedical Claim-Verification Agents
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Literature-searching language agents are becoming a standard component of scientific assistants for the life sciences, yet there is little controlled evidence on which parts of their harness matter. We run a controlled ablation on biomedical claim verification (SciFact) with the live PubMed API as the only tool. Holding the backbone and output format fixed, we compare four harnesses: closed-book answering, single-shot retrieval using the claim as the query, a ReAct-style agent that writes its own PubMed queries, and an oracle given the gold abstracts, each with two efficient frontier backbones. Naive single-shot retrieval finds the gold paper for only 6% of claims and turns overconfident errors into abstentions without improving accuracy. Letting the model formulate its own queries triples gold recall and yields the best verdicts (62% accuracy vs. 49-59% for the other realistic harnesses), although these differences are not significant at our sample size and agents use fewer than half of their search budget. With gold abstracts, the same models reach 79-86% accuracy, a significant 17-24 point gap showing that retrieval, not reasoning, is the main bottleneck. Finally, a citation audit shows that closed-book models cite PubMed IDs that almost always exist (327/335) but are almost never relevant: a cross-family LLM judge rates only 3 of 327 existing citations as relevant to the claim, versus 67% for citations produced by the search agent. Existence checks are therefore insufficient safeguards for scientific agents. We release code, prompts, and all cached tool calls at https://github.com/saqlain2204/real-pmids-wrong-papers.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Artificial Intelligence
Our Own Jev: Typed Decisions in One Forward Pass, from an In-House Judge to Open LoRA Models
Better Reasoning, Not Just Bigger Models: A Structure-Grounded Framework for Efficient and Reliable Inference
Progressive Learning from Content to Relevance to Personalization for CTR Prediction
The Fusion Tax: A Diagnostic Analysis of When Hybrid Retrieval Hurts
Reasoning-Search-Augmented LLMs: An Operational Taxonomy, Benchmark Analysis and Controlled Evidence Synthesis
Get the few papers worth your time in Artificial Intelligence every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.