arXiv preprint ·
TraceForge: Distilling with Your Own Thinking
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Using an LLM to generate training data for another is among the most general ways to train one, and it remains common practice. Some frontier teams have closed that route for their own models: what comes back is an answer, or a short summary, without the detailed reasoning trace behind it. That is a little ironic: they were themselves built on distilling human knowledge, and distilling an open-source model is still entirely routine; the restriction applies to their own outputs alone. Recent work recovers the hidden reasoning by replaying encrypted blocks across models. It somehow works, but it breaks the providers' terms of service, so it is not something a product can be built on long-term. We built the alternative. We take the context and the teacher's answer as input, and generate the reasoning trace ourselves, in the style of the student's own model family. Training is two-stage, supervised and then adversarial: a generator learns to regenerate the family's own reasoning traces from their context and answer, and a critic learns how real a reasoning trace looks. Applied to a teacher's answer, the generator writes one in the family's style. An independent judge rates how likely traces are to be genuine on a scale from 0 to 1: ours average 0.68, real traces 0.66, and traces selected by the critic from four candidates 0.82. These are authenticity scores, not correctness rates. We test the idea on five benchmarks with everything else held fixed. On general tasks the five training corpora are about the same; on coding, the generated reasoning beats Fable 5's own thinking content. With the same 5,000 questions and the same teacher answers, HumanEval+ improves by 3.7 points and MBPP+ by 7.1 at the final checkpoint, and the MBPP+ lead holds at every checkpoint. We suspect that reasoning written in the student's family style is easier for it to learn from.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Artificial Intelligence
VeriEvolve: Evaluator-First Evolution for Tool-Using Agents
Governed Self-Evolution for Autonomous Investing: A Multi-Agent LLM System with an Invariant Core
Enhancing Cross-Grade Generalization in Banana Variety Classification via Hybrid CNN-Transformers and Knowledge Self-Distillation
Lifetime-valid decisions by continually evolving AI analysts
An Evidence-Driven Multi-Agent Compound AI System for Head and Neck Proton Radiotherapy Planning
Get the few papers worth your time in Artificial Intelligence every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.