arXiv preprint ·

Probabilistic Machine Learning for Short-Term Atmospheric Seeing Forecasting

Mary-Joe Medlej, Rahul Srinivasan, Simon Prunet, Aziz Ziad and Christophe Giordano

Published
Source
arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
DOI
10.1117/12.3103367
Original
Read it at arXiv
Topics
Machine LearningInstrumentation & Methods for Astrophysics

In brief

Forecasting the Atmosphere’s Optical Turbulence

The authors benchmark Gaussian Processes and a normalizing-flow model called FloTS against RNN and LSTM baselines using seeing measurements from Maunakea summit. They report that LSTM and FloTS achieve the best overall predictive accuracy, while FloTS produces the most informative probabilistic forecasts.

What they found: The benchmark finds that deep-learning approaches outperform standard recurrent networks for short-term forecasting. LSTM and FloTS achieve the best overall predictive accuracy, while FloTS produces the most informative probabilistic forecasts. Gaussian Processes provide a useful probabilistic baseline, but their predictive distributions are limited by the Gaussian assumption.

AI-written summary. Check anything you rely on against the original paper.

Abstract

Accurate short-term forecasting of atmospheric seeing is of significant interest for astronomical observations and free-space optical communication systems, where rapid variations in optical turbulence can affect system performance and operational planning. In this work, we benchmark machine learning models for predicting atmospheric seeing up to two hours in advance, with a particular focus on probabilistic forecasting and uncertainty quantification. We compare two probabilistic approaches, Gaussian Processes (GPs) and a normalizing-flow- based model (FloTS), against deterministic recurrent neural network (RNN) and long short-term memory (LSTM) baselines. All models are trained and evaluated on seeing measurements from the Maunakea summit. We assess the models using both deterministic metrics, including the root mean square error and the Pearson correlation coefficient, and probabilistic metrics that evaluate the quality and calibration of predictive uncertainty estimates. The results show that deep learning approaches outperform standard recurrent networks for short-term forecasting, with LSTM and FloTS achieving the best overall predictive accuracy. While Gaussian Processes provide a useful probabilistic baseline, their predictive distributions are limited by the Gaussian assumption. FloTS combines competitive forecasting accuracy with flexible uncertainty quantification and produces the most informative probabilistic forecasts.

The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.

Read it on ReadSearch

Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.

Already a reader? Sign in

All new papers in Machine Learning

Get the few papers worth your time in Machine Learning every morning.

ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.

Papers belong to their authors and publishers; every page here links to the original. All research topics