arXiv preprint ·
Same Probabilities, Different Advice: Gain-Loss Framing Effects in High-Stakes LLM Decision Support
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used to support consequential decisions, yet their reliability under equivalent representations of uncertainty remains unclear. Existing work has documented prompt sensitivity, cognitive biases, and confidence miscalibration, but it is still unknown whether high-stakes advice changes when the same probability is expressed through complementary gain and loss frames. We introduce FrameBench-HPS, a controlled benchmark of 2,880 prompts derived from 240 high-stakes scenarios across healthcare, finance, education/career, and legal/consumer-rights domains. Across seven LLMs, gain-loss framing changes the recommendation category in 32.4% of complete groups, with most changes involving uncertainty rather than direct reversals. Human evaluation confirms corresponding shifts in perceived risk and directiveness. Robustness experiments show that framing effects persist under conversational paraphrases and exceed ordinary repeated-generation variability. Probability canonicalization substantially reduces framing sensitivity, identifying probability representation as a practical target for improving consistency in high-stakes LLM decision support.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Artificial Intelligence
VeriEvolve: Evaluator-First Evolution for Tool-Using Agents
Governed Self-Evolution for Autonomous Investing: A Multi-Agent LLM System with an Invariant Core
Target Regeneration Shrinks the Gains of Draft-Training Objectives in Speculative Decoding
TT-SAX: A Two-Track Time Series Symbolization for Natural Language Shape Querying
Our Own Jev: Typed Decisions in One Forward Pass, from an In-House Judge to Open LoRA Models
Get the few papers worth your time in Artificial Intelligence every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.