arXiv preprint ·

Curvature-Scaled Sharpness-Aware Minimization: Convergence Beyond Smoothness

Dimitris Oikonomou and Nicolas Loizou

Published
Source
arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
Original
Read it at arXiv
Topics
Optimization & ControlMachine LearningMachine Learning (Statistics)

Abstract

Sharpness-Aware Minimization (SAM) has established itself as a widely used method for training deep neural networks. Despite its popularity, existing convergence guarantees for SAM-type methods require smoothness, a restrictive assumption. Generalized smoothness conditions have recently been proposed in the analysis of gradient methods but remain underexplored for SAM. To analyze the effect of SAM's perturbation under generalized smoothness, we use relative gradient distortion to quantify how the sharpness-aware direction departs from the original gradient. Under $(L_0,L_1)$-smoothness, we show that this distortion can become unbounded near stationarity for SAM and at large gradients for its unnormalized variant (USAM), with examples where SAM cycles and USAM diverges. We then establish a necessary condition for uniform distortion control among perturbations along the gradient whose nonnegative multipliers depend only on its norm. Motivated by this condition, we propose Curvature-Scaled SAM (CS-SAM), which scales both the perturbation and the descent step by suitable curvature upper bounds, and prove that it uniformly bounds the distortion. Under both $(L_0,L_1)$- and $(H_0,H_1)$-smoothness, we establish deterministic $\mathcal{O}(1/T)$ rates for the best squared gradient norm on nonconvex objectives, last-iterate $\mathcal{O}(1/T)$ rates for the function gap on convex objectives with a minimizer, and linear convergence under the Polyak-Lojasiewicz condition. With zero perturbation, our guarantees recover the rates for gradient descent with $(L_0,L_1)$- or $(H_0,H_1)$-based step-sizes. Minibatch experiments on computer vision tasks demonstrate competitive performance for both variants, with the $(H_0,H_1)$ variant achieving the highest mean best-test accuracy in all four settings against tuned SAM and USAM with constant and cosine annealing schedules.

The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.

Read it on ReadSearch

Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.

Already a reader? Sign in

All new papers in Optimization & Control

Get the few papers worth your time in Optimization & Control every morning.

ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.

Papers belong to their authors and publishers; every page here links to the original. All research topics