arXiv preprint ·
Better Policies, Worse Verifier Audits
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Verifier stacks increasingly sit inside post-training and test-time compute loops. We study a specific control loop: a component verifier is evaluated on fresh policy outputs against the full success label and refreshed when that aggregate score falls. For a conjunctive target $y = F \wedge M$, its on-policy AUC is $(1-q)A_{\mathrm{own}} + qA_{\mathrm{cross}}$, where $q = \Pr[F=1 \mid y=0]$. As the policy masters $F$, $q$ can rise toward one, removing weight from $F$-failures and rewarding information about $M$. We call this on-policy audit collapse. We derive a sharp identified set, a complete-erasure threshold, and the exact point at which the audit can prefer a worse component verifier; its population optimum is the full-outcome predictor, not the component oracle. An exact oracle exhibits the collapse, a natural multi-label text control shows inversion can select a head with lower canonical $F$-AUC at the observed failure mixture, and a prediction-registered ECG study shows that acting on the audit can reduce off-policy $F$-AUC, transfer the damage to an unseen generator, and increase downstream constraint violations. Preserving own-failure support prevents the damage. Matching label-complexity bounds and a controlled-mixture audit give the corresponding repair: audit the component on its own failures, and keep those failures in the refresh distribution.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Machine Learning
A Jump-Modified Wasserstein Gradient Flow for Maximum Mean Discrepancy with Energy Kernels
Lifetime-valid decisions by continually evolving AI analysts
Local and Sparse Kernel Operator Learning for Incompressible Flows: An Operator Lagrange Formulation
When News Gets Old: Portfolio Allocation with Reinforcement Learning and Large Language Models
Target Regeneration Shrinks the Gains of Draft-Training Objectives in Speculative Decoding
Get the few papers worth your time in Machine Learning every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.