arXiv preprint ·
One Policy, Many Styles: Where to Aggregate Preferences for Steerable Humanoid Control?
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Modern robotic agents are increasingly expected to support steerable control, where a single policy can adjust its behavioral style at runtime under changing user preferences. Preference-conditioned reinforcement learning provides this interface, but conditioning alone does not ensure that a requested behavior change is strong, does not leak into unrelated behaviors, and does not compromise task performance. Our evaluation combines Preference Reward Responsiveness (PRR) with coverage and utility metrics. We use these measures to compare reward-level, advantage-level, loss-level, and PCGrad-based aggregation across two humanoid-control frameworks. No aggregation level performs best across all environments and criteria. Experiments show that aggregating objectives early produces a wider range of behavioral responses but greater unintended changes in other objectives, while aggregating them later improves control precision at some cost to responsiveness.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Robotics
Real-Time Disturbance-Aware Koopman Model Predictive Control for Quadrotors in Spatially Varying Winds
PHD-Hand: A Printable Humanoid Dexterous Hand with Linkage-Driven 3-DOA Digits
Towards Autonomous Bricklaying Using Boston Dynamics Spot
Causal world models under physical parameter shifts
HATCH: Hardware-Attested Task Chains for Verifiable Manipulation
Get the few papers worth your time in Robotics every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.