arXiv preprint ·
Where Has the Foreign Signal Gone?
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
We compare the relation between sentiment noise in the Twitter feed and losses for stocks of domestic and foreign firms. The mean quarterly domestic-foreign difference in the slope of next-quarter losses on measured noise is -1.40 (Newey-West t = -2.99). This slope is negative for 78 and 48 percent of the quarters for domestic and foreign stocks, respectively (block-bootstrap p = 0.016). Thus, this relationship is temporally more stable for domestic stocks. We use a noisy rational expectations model to explain these patterns through the composition of the contributor pool. The feeds for stocks of foreign firms have higher repeat-author concentration and a larger model-implied nonfundamental component than those for domestic firms. We interpret these differences through the producer-knowledge mismatch hypothesis. For foreign firms, the English-language contributor pool underrepresents the home-market investors who tend to possess informational advantages about them. Thus, the foreign signal is not gone but diluted.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Econometrics
Arithmetic Models for Commodity Futures, Vanilla, and Calendar Spread Options
Fuji: The Shape, Composition, and Spread of Demand Bursts on Robinhood Chain
Model Selection for Off-Policy Evaluation via Pairwise Bellman Validation
OptScientist: Automated Discovery of Optimization Laws
Contemporaneous Transmission Networks and Systemic Risk in European Banking
Get the few papers worth your time in Econometrics every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.