arXiv preprint ·
Predicting silent failures of learned inference under restricted access: what measurement physics and prior information explain
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Learned priors are used to reconstruct regions that measurements barely reach, and to report uncertainty there. They can fail silently: the reported interval excludes the truth while every ground-truth-free diagnostic stays within its noise. We call such errors the blind set and ask whether they can be predicted before the target data are seen. For a correctly specified linear-Gaussian model averaged over the prior, the risk of a silent failure factorises exactly into non-detection and non-coverage, which does not hold for learned systems in general; we build a score that approximates this reference by linearising a VAE prior. In a prospective study on real X-ray CT objects (2DeteCT) under simulated restricted access, with predictions committed by hash before any trial, the score ranked the realised blindness of two learned inference systems (latent Laplace and ensemble Kalman inversion) with Spearman $ρ= 0.79$ and 0.84 over 240 pre-specified errors. Simple structural predictors would also have passed these tests. Sequential post-hoc analyses, each specified before its own computation, show that under bounded reach the learned score gave no detectable improvement over a physics-based baseline, in rankings or trial-level log scores. At the weakest attenuation studied, prior information improved rankings over the physics-based baseline, most clearly for ensemble Kalman inversion, but a Gaussian prior did as well and the gain was not detectable at the trial level. The score is not a calibrated probability. Silent failures can be anticipated here, but their structure follows mainly from measurement access and the decision quantity rather than from the learned prior.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Machine Learning (Statistics)
A Bayesian machine learning approach to direct and spillover effects in cluster-randomized trials with noncompliance
A Jump-Modified Wasserstein Gradient Flow for Maximum Mean Discrepancy with Energy Kernels
Beyond Scalar Leaderboards: Adaptive Sampling for Pareto Frontier Identification in Multi-Objective LLM Arenas
Internal Guidance as a Sampling Method for Tilted Diffusion Models
MiCLA: Mixture-to-Constituent Latent Alignment for Polyphonic Audio Representation Learning
Get the few papers worth your time in Machine Learning (Statistics) every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.