arXiv preprint ·
When Do Humans and Machines Truly Complement Each Other? Formal Conditions and Empirical Evidence for Human-AI Synergy
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Can humans and artificial intelligence cooperate such that their combination yields greater accuracy than either agent alone? This result, termed \emph{synergy} or \emph{complementarity}, is notoriously difficult to achieve, even when both agents possess significant independent accuracy. In this paper, we present a formal framework to model human-AI interaction through the lens of reliance patterns, which characterize the joint correctness structure of human and algorithmic decisions. We derive mathematically necessary and sufficient conditions for synergy, demonstrating that its emergence depends on the ability of either agent to identify and correct the errors of the other, what we call Human and Algorithmic Correction. Beyond its theoretical contribution, the proposed framework provides a foundation for the design and evaluation of knowledge-based decision support systems, where interaction policies must dynamically integrate heterogeneous sources of expertise. We demonstrate this through the analysis of seven clinical case studies. Our empirical results reveal a ``dominance trap,'' where a strong algorithmic advantage can paradoxically inhibit synergy by eroding human corrective intervention. We also show that synergy can persist even in the presence of cognitive biases, such as automation bias, provided there is functional de-correlation between human and AI errors. These results provide a formal foundation for key concepts in the human-AI systems literature and offer actionable insights for designing interaction-centric AI systems that foster complementarity.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Artificial Intelligence
KPHarness: Co-Evolving Knowledge and Probing for Long-Horizon Gaming Harnesses
VeriEvolve: Evaluator-First Evolution for Tool-Using Agents
The Router Already Knows
Enhancing Cross-Grade Generalization in Banana Variety Classification via Hybrid CNN-Transformers and Knowledge Self-Distillation
Harness Self-Evolution for Long-Horizon Terminal Agents
Get the few papers worth your time in Artificial Intelligence every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.