arXiv preprint ·
How Developers Configure LLM Inference: A Large-Scale Study of Real-World Practices
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
LLMs are increasingly integrated into software systems, making deployment and inference configuration a recurring software engineering task. Inference backends expose many options that affect model loading, generation, serving, and request processing. Yet little is known about which of these options developers explicitly configure in practice. In this paper, we present a large-scale empirical study of LLM inference configuration practices in open-source software using Hugging Face Transformers, vLLM, and the OpenAI API. We analyze 5,398 GitHub repositories using at least one of these backends and identify 345,117 explicitly configured option occurrences. Our results show that developers use only a small part of the available configuration space regularly. Although 98.8% of the documented backend-specific options appear at least once, 78.9% are configured in at most 10% of repositories using the corresponding backend. Configurations are also small, with a median of 2 options for Transformers and 4 for vLLM and OpenAI, but the combinations of options vary widely: 56.8-61.6% of multi-option signatures appear in only one repository. We also observe recurring option values as well as substantial variation in how values are chosen. Finally, configuration practices differ across application contexts, with option-adoption differences reaching 30.7 percentage points. These findings characterize the configuration surface developers make explicit rather than the importance or optimality of individual options. They provide empirical evidence for prioritizing future studies of inference configuration and for improving backend documentation and configuration support.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Software Engineering
Recoverability and Verifier Strength: Two Measured Preconditions for Unattended Agent Self-Improvement
VeriEvolve: Evaluator-First Evolution for Tool-Using Agents
Auditing the Product, Not the Recursion: The Evaluation Evidence Behind Recursive Self-Improvement Claims
Symmetry-Oriented Testing Framework for Variational Quantum Algorithms
Standards-Guided and Dependency-Aware Code-Level Documentation Generation
Get the few papers worth your time in Software Engineering every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.