arXiv preprint ·
Temporal Evidence Allocation For Longitudinal Clinical Retrieval: A Position And Technical Report
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Electronic health records are written to support care, not retrieval. Across years of oncology notes, the primary diagnosis is restated in report after report, while the events that shape a patient's course, such as a recurrence or a change in therapy, may be recorded only once. A retriever that ranks passages by similarity to the query keeps returning the repeated material and can miss these transitions, that is, it exhibits temporal redundancy across historical narratives. We argue that longitudinal clinical retrieval should be treated as allocating a limited evidence budget across time, not just ranking by relevance. We separate the task into three objectives: temporal evidence allocation, candidate reconstruction, and clinical validation. In Study A (13 clinical queries over 20 patient records, with two-stage reconstruction), the Temporal-15 configuration reaches a milestone slot recall of 0.538, compared with 0.388 for the Global-50 baseline. However, it also retrieves far more evidence (496 versus 50 indexed units per query), so the gain cannot be credited to allocation alone. When evidence is held fixed, removing prompted precedence rules raises schema-order reversals from 0.010 to 0.080. A five-patient, single-query pilot with fixed budgets finds that wider temporal coverage does not reliably yield more dated milestones. Together, these results suggest that how much a record says about a period is a poor guide to how useful that period is as evidence. Because no expert reference timelines are available, our measurements describe retrieval behavior rather than clinical accuracy. This position and technical report presents the retrieval analysis behind the Onco-CONSTRUE framework and sets out a research agenda for budget-constrained longitudinal clinical retrieval.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Artificial Intelligence
KPHarness: Co-Evolving Knowledge and Probing for Long-Horizon Gaming Harnesses
VeriEvolve: Evaluator-First Evolution for Tool-Using Agents
The Router Already Knows
Enhancing Cross-Grade Generalization in Banana Variety Classification via Hybrid CNN-Transformers and Knowledge Self-Distillation
Harness Self-Evolution for Long-Horizon Terminal Agents
Get the few papers worth your time in Artificial Intelligence every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.