arXiv preprint ·
When Does Feedback Help? Auditing Learned Voltage-Clamp Experimental Design
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
A learned scientific controller can outperform a misspecified planner without benefiting from feedback. We audit two synthetic voltage-clamp tasks with a training-selected fixed protocol, current masking, a Bayesian reference, and an excluded target. Five recurrent policies repeat one fixed protocol in all 1,200 off-grid rollouts; masking current changes no decision. In a crossed four-hypothesis task, a fixed diagnostic pulse is followed by one learned choice. Policies then use the first current, but tie a correctly specified Bayesian controller, and a fitted threshold reproduces the learned actions without being that controller. The excluded-target prediction gain is $4.6991\times10^{-6}$ nats per sample. Feedback use and protocol quality are separate tests. These cases establish neither biological discovery nor general RL superiority.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Artificial Intelligence
KPHarness: Co-Evolving Knowledge and Probing for Long-Horizon Gaming Harnesses
VeriEvolve: Evaluator-First Evolution for Tool-Using Agents
The Router Already Knows
Enhancing Cross-Grade Generalization in Banana Variety Classification via Hybrid CNN-Transformers and Knowledge Self-Distillation
Harness Self-Evolution for Long-Horizon Terminal Agents
Get the few papers worth your time in Artificial Intelligence every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.