arXiv preprint ·
What Not to Erase: Saliency-Constrained Augmentation for Low-Resource Handwritten Character Recognition
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and handwritten character recognition (HCR) in low-resource historical material collections often rely on data augmentation, yet augmentation strategies are typically evaluated almost exclusively through predictive accuracy. This leaves open whether a model's improved performance is accompanied by saliency stability. This question is important in low-resource historical HCR, where recognition is performed on variable and partially degraded letterforms and two models with similar predictive performance may differ in how consistently their saliency patterns respond to such variation. We therefore study saliency-guided augmentation as an explanation-aware strategy for low-resource HCR. Rather than treating saliency maps only as post-hoc interpretations, we use them to define augmentation variants that perturb, preserve, or constrain visually informative regions of character images. We compare classical document-style transformations, random lacunae, and several saliency-constrained lacuna variants. To evaluate the effect of augmentation beyond accuracy, we introduce the Explainability Consistency Index (ECI), a metric that quantifies the stability of saliency patterns under controlled perturbations. We find that saliency-constrained augmentation can improve recognition over classical augmentation, but no single saliency strategy is consistently best. The preferred form of the constraint varies with both architecture and corpus, indicating that saliency is better treated as a mechanism for controlling augmentation than as a fixed augmentation strategy. In some settings, saliency-constrained training improves explanation consistency even when predictive performance is similar. This shows that predictive metrics alone can obscure differences in model sensitivity under perturbation, motivating explanation consistency as a complementary evaluation dimension.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computer Vision
CheXFuse: Guided Differential Joint Attention Fusion for Robust Multimodal Chest X-Ray Classification in Data-Scarce Medical Settings
Test-time Adaptation for Point Cloud Denoising under Unseen Noise
Recurrent Vision Transformers for Event-Based Spacecraft Pose Estimation Under Slow Relative Motions
KPHarness: Co-Evolving Knowledge and Probing for Long-Horizon Gaming Harnesses
Where Do the Gaussians Go? Foreground Attraction for Camera-Based Weakly Supervised 3D Occupancy
Get the few papers worth your time in Computer Vision every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.