arXiv preprint ·

Bidirectionality is Necessary in Cellular Machines for Exact-Arrival Multi-Agent Path Finding

Masashi Aono

Published
Source
arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
Original
Read it at arXiv
Topics
Emerging TechnologiesComputational ComplexityDistributed & Parallel ComputingMultiagent Systems

Abstract

On ranked directed acyclic graphs coupled by vertex conflicts we study exact-arrival multi-agent path finding (departure and arrival pinned in place and time) posed as a distributed output task: every cell must emit its own bit of a valid joint path-support mask. The machines are cellular: one automaton per cell, state factored over cells, communication only along a fixed local fabric, synchronous rounds, a query-independent output round, no central decoder, and a per-topology transition code. "Necessary" here means: on an explicit hard topology, over all its feasible queries, no universally correct local-only architecture can renounce either temporal orientation; with global flags, impossibility becomes a bandwidth-round trade-off. The class is not vacuous: a flooding machine solves every instance in as many rounds as the diameter of the local fabric. The bound survives two concessions: we supply every agent's exact individual cavity, which alone solves the single-agent problem in zero rounds and makes the single-agent direction theorem vacuous; and we allow $k$ one-bit global aggregate flags. On a twelve-cell, two-agent, depth-three topology no forward-only machine with $k=0$ is correct on two feasible queries, for any number of rounds; the time-reversed topology does the same to backward-only machines. Placing $p$ copies side by side gives, for forward-only machines, $J_R+kR\ge p$ at constant depth, where $J_R$ measures how much of the query reaches the targets' cones and is $0$ here. A backward-only machine solves that family in constant rounds and a flag-streaming one in $\lceil p/k\rceil+O(1)$, so the bound is tight in order; on the composite family neither orientation can be renounced. The finite lemmas of the gadget and the pair-invariance contradictions are checked in Lean 4; the semantic bridge, the cone lemma and the counting are paper proofs. We report no benchmarks.

The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.

Read it on ReadSearch

Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.

Already a reader? Sign in

All new papers in Emerging Technologies

Get the few papers worth your time in Emerging Technologies every morning.

ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.

Papers belong to their authors and publishers; every page here links to the original. All research topics