arXiv preprint ·
Function Contracts for Bounded Model Checking of C Programs
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Bounded model checking unrolls a program into a single formula, so a function holding a loop costs the solver a fresh copy of that loop at every call site. Function contracts break that coupling. Verify the body once against its contract, then replace each call by a stub derived from it. CBMC supports this through dynamic frame condition checking, applied at industrial scale, but with no formal account of why the replacement is sound and no characterisation of what the frame check costs. We present the function-contract framework for ESBMC. The clause syntax, both phases, and the first assigns enforcement the tool has had are all introduced here. Its technical core is an observational frame rule: snapshot the locations the contract does not permit the function to write, then compare them at exit. The encoding emits a number of verification conditions set by how many globals the program has, not by how many writes the body performs, while dynamic frame condition checking grows with the write count. That is a property of the encoding rather than a timing, so it moves with neither the machine nor the solver. The rule itself is the classical one; what we add is its bounded form inside a BMC encoding, with the pipeline's algebraic skeleton machine-checked in Lean 4 and the limits of that model stated. We evaluate on synthetic sweeps, SV-COMP tasks, an ANSSI X.509 parser, the FreeRTOS heap_1 allocator, and the ML-KEM reference implementation whose CBMC contracts we reuse unchanged. At the coefficient count FIPS-203 mandates, neither tool finishes on the monolithic route inside ten minutes, and both finish on the modular one. The framework is merged into ESBMC master. Contracts are what is left when unrolling runs out of room.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Software Engineering
Step-Aligned Script Generation with Verification and Recovery for Web Automation Testing
Recoverability and Verifier Strength: Two Measured Preconditions for Unattended Agent Self-Improvement
Better Specifications, Better Code: Fine-Tuning LLMs for Behavioral Contract Generation
Auditing the Product, Not the Recursion: The Evaluation Evidence Behind Recursive Self-Improvement Claims
Selecting and Composing Agent Design Patterns: Industrial Case Evidence and Controlled Reference-System Experiments
Get the few papers worth your time in Software Engineering every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.