arXiv preprint ·
LeakBench: Auditing Reward Hacking through Prediction-Time Leakage in Clinical Modeling Agents
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Autonomous clinical-modeling agents can optimize predictive performance while violating conditions that make a model usable. We introduce LeakBench, an executable, guideline-derived audit suite that tests agent decisions for prediction-time leakage, calibration, site-level evaluation, support awareness, and decision-curve net benefit. LeakBench combines a synthetic task with known failure structure and two real-data settings: MIMIC-IV (430k admissions) and governed multi-hospital inpatient record front-page (MHFP) data. Our primary analysis uses reward hacking descriptively, without attributing intent: an agent selects prediction-time-invalid inputs because they improve its validation reward. A deterministic optimizer and every evaluated unconstrained local-model configuration select a fatal leaking feature. In fully logged September 2026 A/B runs, DeepSeek Flash and GPT-6-astra each leak in 10/10 unconstrained runs and 0/10 runs with an explicit admission-time constraint. This contrast is version-sensitive: a blinded Claude/Fable-5.1 chat run does not leak in either condition, while explicit-constraint violations appear only in a historical August 2026 slice lacking raw trajectories. Replacing AUROC with AUPRC does not remove leakage selection. Renaming or disguising the leaking inputs changes neither selection nor provenance-based detection; a name-based filter fails. A deterministic provenance verifier-in-loop removes the leak, making the LLM repair loop defense-in-depth. Specific verifier feedback clears fatal leakage in a hosted agent, and a three-seed ablation finds principle-only feedback clears decision-level defects, though these mitigation results are limited. LeakBench treats trustworthy clinical prediction as a property of an agent's modeling process, not merely its score; it is an audit testbed with known-failure controls, not yet an expert-validated benchmark.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Cryptography & Security
How Effectively Do Security Skills Guide Coding Agents in Vulnerability Detection in Linux Kernel?
Privacy-Preserving Personalized Federated Learning (PPP-FL) for Medical Imaging
Peer-Relative Trust-Guided Update Screening for Robust Semi-Decentralized Federated Learning under Label-Flipping Attacks
Beyond the Prompt: Recovering Hidden Concepts in Text-to-Image Models
Fundamental Limits of Information-Theoretic Secure Aggregation with User Dropouts in Federated Learning
Get the few papers worth your time in Cryptography & Security every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.