arXiv preprint ·
Neither Over- nor Under-Constrained: Evaluating LLM Personalization under a Constraint Qualification Audit
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Accurate evaluation of LLM personalization is hindered by current evaluation paradigms that over- or under-constrain the response space, yielding frequent false rejections and false acceptances. To reduce these false rates, we introduce ConQual-Audit, an audit-based framework that evaluates LLM personalization through a three-stage process: (1) extracting semantic constraints from user profiles and task-grounded reference; (2) qualifying constraints by pruning unnecessary constraints and recovering missing constraints; and (3) verifying candidate responses against the audited constraints via natural language inference. Across PrefEval and LaMP, ConQual-Audit outperforms nine baselines, attaining top AUCs (0.88 and 0.90) and the lowest false rate (0.21) on the leanest constraint sets at an amortizable audit cost. Crucially, this constraint audit is portable: integrating it into ExPerT and PREF helps revise smaller, higher-quality constraint sets to reduce their evaluation false rates.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Artificial Intelligence
When Better Opportunities Backfire: Service Worker Responses to Parallel AI Deployment in Customer Acquisition
KPHarness: Co-Evolving Knowledge and Probing for Long-Horizon Gaming Harnesses
Safety Offset Learning: When Benign Fine-Tuning Misaligns LLMs
The Router Already Knows
Weighted State Souping for Efficient Long-Context Retrieval
Get the few papers worth your time in Artificial Intelligence every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.