arXiv preprint ·
Design and Cross-Domain Evaluation of an Agent Execution Harness
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Completing complex tasks with language-model agents requires coordinating planning, execution, and review so the final result addresses the user's original objective. We present an agent execution harness that keeps the original objective separate from a revisable plan and an execution record. A planner assigns scoped tasks, workers produce outputs and artifacts, and a reviewer examines results against the original request before submitting or requesting additional work. Reusable domain-specific instructions guide these roles and are refined during construction using task inputs and execution trajectories, without official grading feedback. We evaluate complete harness configurations across terminal tasks, clinical responses, application building, and scientific questions. On Terminal-Bench 2.1, the harness passes 83 of 89 instances (93.26%); on HealthBench Professional, a Fable-configured system achieves a length-adjusted rubric score of 69.63 across 525 tasks. In a 53-task paired HealthBench comparison, the Fable-configured harness achieves an aggregate score 19.89 points higher than direct completion, despite a $-1.46$-point median task-level change; mean inference cost rises from \$0.29 to \$2.13 per task. We combine these outcomes with latency, documented instruction revisions, and reviewer decisions. Evaluating outcomes alongside execution trajectories and resource use clarifies how coordination supports task completion, where it introduces regressions, and at what cost.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Artificial Intelligence
Stable Signer V3: 4D Deformable Primitive Splatting Is All You Need for Sign Language Production
When Better Opportunities Backfire: Service Worker Responses to Parallel AI Deployment in Customer Acquisition
Means-Ends Analysis Helps LLMs Plan in Continuous-State Domains
Safety Offset Learning: When Benign Fine-Tuning Misaligns LLMs
What Can't Jev Decide? Probing the Limits of One-Pass Decision Models
Get the few papers worth your time in Artificial Intelligence every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.