arXiv preprint ·
Quality-Controlled Reply and Summary Data for Post-Training Small Language Models in AI Call-Screening Agents
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Small language models have improved to the point where a phone can plausibly screen its own calls, answering on an absent owner's behalf without sending call content off the device, a privacy-respecting alternative to cloud call handling. Realizing that promise takes a model that can do two things well: reply within the owner's authority during the call, and afterward tell the owner what happened and what needs attention. Released small models do neither reliably - they raise unwarranted alarms about ordinary callers and write summaries that drop material conditions or report a caller's claims as fact - and real calls supply no reference replies or summaries to learn from. We construct supervision for both tasks from synthetic calls under an information-boundary constraint: a caller writer works from a private scenario brief, a reply writer sees only the conversation up to the current turn, and a summary writer sees the completed transcript. Separate model-based reviews of the full dialogue and the summary decide which calls enter training, yielding a corpus of 3,395 calls with 15,102 targets (11,707 reply, 3,395 summary). Training a single shared LoRA adapter on both tasks, we evaluate six models (0.6-4B parameters) before and after adaptation on 192 held-out calls. Reply qualification rises from 21-54% to 94-97% and summary qualification from 0-6% to 43-72%; all twelve paired gains (six models x two tasks) have bootstrap intervals above zero, and the summary gains hold in every source family. Because one model both screened the training data and scored the outputs, these rates measure agreement with that evaluator's standard rather than human acceptance, which a planned human study will test. After adaptation, coherence and naturalness failures nearly vanish, leaving grounding and usefulness - faithfully tracking who said what, under which conditions - as the remaining challenge.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computation & Language / NLP
Stable Signer V3: 4D Deformable Primitive Splatting Is All You Need for Sign Language Production
Cognitive Maps in Large Language Models
What Can't Jev Decide? Probing the Limits of One-Pass Decision Models
Text Dominance in Paralinguistic Conflict: Tracing Suppression Through Audio LLM Circuits
Epi: Towards a Persistent, Self-Improving Agent for Autonomous Research
Get the few papers worth your time in Computation & Language / NLP every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.