arXiv preprint ·

Design Considerations in Low-Resource Archival OCR: A Case Study in Lakota

Téa Wright, Laura X. Ma, Claudia Iron Hawk, Hannah J. Haynie, Alexis Palmer, Alane Suhr, Abteen Ebrahimi and Katharina von der Wense

Published
Source
arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
Original
Read it at arXiv
Topics
Computation & Language / NLP

Abstract

Building and expanding access to digital archives supports language reclamation and creates lasting resources for community revitalization. Designing effective tools to support these efforts requires taking into account the community-, language-, and document-specific context. We investigate how small ($\leq$3B) vision-language models (VLMs) can be adapted as optical character recognition (OCR) tools for Lakota, a North American Indigenous language. In addition to benchmarking modeling approaches, we inspect four practical facets of low-resource archival OCR that arise in previous work and conversations with community members: constrained training budgets, segmentation noise, scan degradation, and orthographic variance. We demonstrate that fine-tuning VLMs for OCR post-correction on 35 pages of transcribed data decreases character error rate (CER) from 17.1 to 3.9\% on a bilingual corpus, and find that training only with nine pages increases CER by only 1.1\% over this. However, evaluating under realistic automatic segmentation nearly doubles the CER of the best-performing models, stressing the importance of taking realistic use cases into account. We hope this work encourages future research on developing language technologies grounded in the workflows and constraints of ongoing revitalization efforts.

The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.

Read it on ReadSearch

Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.

Already a reader? Sign in

All new papers in Computation & Language / NLP

Get the few papers worth your time in Computation & Language / NLP every morning.

ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.

Papers belong to their authors and publishers; every page here links to the original. All research topics