arXiv preprint ·

NeuroAct: Advancing EEG Analysis and Decoding via Dual-Loop Autonomous Research

Wei Xiong, Jiangtong Li, Han Zhao, Linxiao Yang, Jie Li and Changjun Jiang

Published
Source
arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
Original
Read it at arXiv
Topics
Machine LearningArtificial IntelligenceSignal Processing

Abstract

EEG analysis and decoding underpin brain-computer interfaces, cognitive assessment, and sleep monitoring. Fixed pipelines and reward-driven search do not explicitly determine how signal structure, representations, predictor behavior, and training dynamics contribute to performance or generalization gaps, leaving intervention choice underdetermined. We introduce NeuroAct, an autonomous research agent framework for EEG analysis and decoding. NeuroAct implements dual-loop autonomous research across EEG foundation models, task-specific predictors, and model combinations. In an inner loop, research, development, and review roles use evidence on signal structure, representations, predictor behavior, and training dynamics to test hypotheses, select analyses or interventions, and refine candidates using performance, stability, and cost feedback. An outer loop distills outcomes into conditional, testable recommendations with task and model conditions, then validates and revises them on subsequent tasks.We evaluate four settings: (A) EEG General Analysis, (B) Cross-task Model Optimization, (C) Single-task Open Research, and (D) Collaborative Prediction. In Setting A, NeuroAct's 80.88 macro-average exceeds BrainAgent's 63.13 by 17.75 points. In Setting B, NeuroAct raises EEGPT's mean balanced accuracy (BA) by 7.34 points and HBN Pearson's (r) from 0.6894 to 0.7362; in Setting C, it improves ADFTD BA by 16.33 points; and in Setting D, it raises Workload BA from 79.69% to 85.02%. Experience reuse raises BCIC-IV-2a BA from 34.66% to 50.81% while reducing LLM tokens by 64.02%, indicating recommendations improve cross-task performance. NeuroAct enables evidence-guided EEG research improved by cross-task experience.

The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.

Read it on ReadSearch

Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.

Already a reader? Sign in

All new papers in Machine Learning

Get the few papers worth your time in Machine Learning every morning.

ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.

Papers belong to their authors and publishers; every page here links to the original. All research topics