arXiv preprint ·

Shallow Probes Are Sufficient for Near-Oracle Personalization Depth Allocation in Federated Learning

Beyazit Bestami Yuksel, Emrah Dikbiyik and Ayse Yilmazer Metin

Published
Source
arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
Original
Read it at arXiv
Topics
Machine Learning

Abstract

Rather than proposing a new federated optimizer, we study whether a small client-specific measurement budget can support cost-aware personalization-depth decisions under a utility that trades Macro-F1 against deployment cost. Exhaustive evaluation of six depths defines an offline oracle that is not deployable. We audit the Probe Sufficiency Hypothesis: three shallow probes (P0--P2) may contain most decision-relevant information for approaching that oracle. FedPBA is a secondary learned instantiation for deep-action extrapolation. On CIFAR-10/100 and patient-disjoint PTB-XL (45 sessions; 900 clients; 2700 evaluations; GroupKFold), training-free greedy probing achieves regret 0.0071 and 98.3 percent oracle recovery, beating metadata-only policies and FedPBA (0.0110 / 97.3 percent). Aggregate shallow-best versus oracle correlation is 0.9818 but falls to 0.578 on deep-oracle rows; PTB-XL deep-oracle cases remain a high-regret boundary without a validated escalation gate.

The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.

Read it on ReadSearch

Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.

Already a reader? Sign in

All new papers in Machine Learning

Get the few papers worth your time in Machine Learning every morning.

ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.

Papers belong to their authors and publishers; every page here links to the original. All research topics