Compile Once, Run Cheap: Frozen, Portable Skills for Embodied Agents, and What Recursive Self-Improvement Adds

Abstract

Embodied AI lacks the data-rich pretraining that gave language models their agents and skills, so new manipulation capability costs demonstrations per task or a frontier model in every episode. We study a third route: a strong general model acts only as an offline author that writes, runs, diagnoses and repairs a manipulation skill in simulation until it passes an exam on layouts drawn after freezing; the frozen skill then runs as code alone or under a cheap caller that reads only its description. We call this skill-level recursive self-improvement Skill-RSI and specify a compile protocol (isolated, audited author; hidden validation layouts; no-feedback and inherit-only controls; tamper-evident ledger) and a reuse protocol that runs the identical files with executors from another model family. On 7 RoboTwin 2.0 tasks with cluttered tables, Claude Code compiled 4 tasks into 7 frozen skills, 5 from a first draft needing only qualification, at USD 4.29-8.22 of author cost each (USD 55 per skill counting the 13 failed campaigns). The other three tasks did not compile in 18 campaigns, including five with GPT-6 and a pre-registered 150-layout run: on the hardest task every campaign scored 78-95 of 100 but had 3-16 safety aborts, failing the gate of 95% success with zero aborts; a 100-episode exam bounds an abort rate only to 3.6%. On hidden layouts, repair that inherits the previous version beat from-scratch rewriting in 8 of 8 controlled campaigns (sign test p = 0.004); an inherit-only lineage attributes most of the gap to inheritance, with development feedback adding a little (3 of 3, p = 0.125). Write-once campaigns found no detectable first-draft effect of practice (minimum detectable effect 14 points). The frozen skills kept 148/150 successes on new layouts with no model and 147/150 with a DeepSeek-flash caller at USD 0.00028-0.00054 per episode; no direct-control baseline was run.

The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.

More in Robotics

• arXiv preprint · 18 October 2026

  Dream What I Can: Sparse Visual Planning for Long-Horizon Robot Manipulation

  Chongkai Gao, Wenlong Huang, Haonan Chen and 5 others
• arXiv preprint · 19 October 2026

  Vector-Quantized World Model: Latent Feedback Motion Planning for Robot Manipulation

  Xuezhou Xu, Chung-Pang Wang, Zhenzhen Li and 1 other
• arXiv preprint · 18 October 2026

  Scalable, Intuitive, Mixed Reality-Based Semi-Autonomous Robotic Telemanipulation for the Execution of a Fine-Grained Bimanual Task

  Shifei Duan, Zhe Wang, Francesco De Pace and 1 other
• arXiv preprint · 19 October 2026

  Humanoid SRL: Augmenting Humanoids with Supernumerary Limbs for Coordinated Loco-Manipulation

  Fukang Liu, Feiyang Wu, Paul Barsa and 12 others
• arXiv preprint · 18 October 2026

  Finite-Time Capture by a Dubins Pursuer Against Unknown Evader Strategies

  Dinesh Patra, Bhargav Jha and Ashish R. Hota

All new papers in Robotics