arXiv preprint ·
Beyond Factual Accuracy: A Benchmark for Evaluating Perspective Alignment in LLMs
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Large Language Models often generate factually correct responses that fail to maintain user-requested perspectives, blending multiple perspectives and forcing users to filter through unwanted information---a perspective control failure that factual accuracy metrics cannot detect. We introduce PerspectiveBench, a benchmark quantifying perspective alignment by constructing scenarios where multiple valid reasoning paths coexist, and propose the Perspective Alignment Score (PAS) to measure adherence to specified perspectives. Experiments reveal that state-of-the-art models successfully include target content but fail to exclude non-requested perspectives. Providing documents through RAG improves factual grounding but does not resolve perspective drift, as models prioritize comprehensive coverage over strict user constraints. Code and data are available at https://github.com/sunghoon014/PerspectiveBench.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computation & Language / NLP
Stable Signer V3: 4D Deformable Primitive Splatting Is All You Need for Sign Language Production
Cognitive Maps in Large Language Models
What Can't Jev Decide? Probing the Limits of One-Pass Decision Models
Text Dominance in Paralinguistic Conflict: Tracing Suppression Through Audio LLM Circuits
Epi: Towards a Persistent, Self-Improving Agent for Autonomous Research
Get the few papers worth your time in Computation & Language / NLP every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.