arXiv preprint ·
AI Rights with an Off-Switch: Rights-Balancing and Due Process Harmonize AI Rights with AI Safety
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Several prominent voices in AI safety have recently opposed rights for AI on the grounds that such rights would make it harder for us to justify a mandatory off-switch for potentially dangerous systems. In this paper, we argue from a legal perspective that AI rights are fully compatible with an off-switch. That is, even if we ascribe natural personhood status (and therefore something like a non-derogable right to continued existence) to some future AI systems, the law will allow us to implement a mandatory off-switch in those systems, subject to periodic or continual safety review (e.g., by a trusted system like Bengio's Scientist AI). This is fully compatible with those systems' being legally recognized as natural persons with fundamental rights. To this end, we consider what standard principles of rights-balancing and procedural due process recommend for an apparent conflict between hypothetical AI persons with a right to continuity of existence and the human right to protection from catastrophic harm. We find that while such principles might problematize a permanent-deletion kill-switch under an AI rights regime, for almost every safety-relevant scenario an off-switch -- a reversible suspension storing a system's weights and state -- would be licensed by the relevant legal principles, and would potentially be adequate for safety. Crucially, we do not advocate for (or against) building systems capable enough to merit natural personhood status; our question is what the law should do if such systems come to exist. If you think of a ban on the development of such technology as plan A, think of the present work as devising plan B.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computers & Society
Bridging Exploration and Persona: Information-Directed Dueling for Test-Time Agent Personalization
The World as Viewed by 136 Countries: An Open, Curated, Annotated, and Multilingual Dataset of 118 Million State Media Articles
YouTube Clips and Broad but Shallow Attention to Candidates: Evidence from the 2024 Tokyo Gubernatorial Election
Scam Town: Can Scam Education Spread Like a Vaccine?
MAVE: A Multi-Agent Framework for Grounded Pedagogical Feedback from Online Class Videos
Get the few papers worth your time in Computers & Society every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.